The requirement is about reducing public and compliance risk
Proof of funds requirements are often an attempt to establish that a traveler can reasonably support their stay without unauthorized work, destitution, or dependence on emergency intervention.
Why it appears inconsistent
Not every traveler is asked, and not every border interaction is equally detailed. That can make the rule feel arbitrary.
But the underlying logic is usually the same. Officials are testing whether the trip is plausible in financial terms.
The useful frame
Think of proof of funds not as a moral judgment but as a credibility signal inside a larger admissibility assessment.